On a Fox News interview (video) climate change skeptic Richard Lindzen says:
But there is no agreement that the warming we've seen is due to man. Moreover, the warming we've seen is much less than we would have expected on the basis of the models that produce alarm.So I guess this list of people are in no agreement. It seems as if national academies of 18 total countries never signed these two press releases. And Lindzen says the models are wrong? It looks as if these graphs and predictions are fake then.
See the video of Lindzen talking here. If anyone can download the video please help me out. I want a copy of this on my hard drive so I can take clips of this to add to his profile page.
Subscribe to our feed!
4 comments:
Richard Lindzen says:
But there is no agreement that the warming we've seen is due to man.
Apparently, Lindzen would say there was "no agreement" as long as someone, anyone, (such as Lindzen) continued to disagree with the now massive consensus on climate change. i.e., in Lindzen Land there is no agreement until every last human being agrees. Sigh...
GIGOT: Some of these predictions of global warming of five, six degrees over the next century — obviously we don't know that for a fact because it's ahead of us. They're based on computer models. How accurate are those models?
LINDZEN: At this point, there's virtually no objective criterion that says that they work. Moreover, I mean, carbon dioxide alone wouldn't cause that. It would only cause about a degree.
The predictions of a lot more come from the way the models treat clouds. Every modeler I know acknowledges that they do it disastrous job on clouds. So those predictions are based on things that we know are wrong.
Lindzen did not answer the question. He was asked "How accurate are those models?" The answer is that over the next century they predict a range of 1.5C to 6.5C. In other words the accuracy of the models is appallling!
The answer is that over the next century they predict a range of 1.5C to 6.5C. In other words the accuracy of the models is appallling!
Yes, I agree the range is pretty wide. But I'm sure you can agree that even the lowest end of the range is something that would be nice to avoid.
And I'm sure you can agree hansen's comparison of models to the past and his accuracy since 1988 are both objective criterion that they work.
vince del monte fitness -
warp speed fat loss -
water 4 gas -
wedding speech 4u -
wp goldmine -
wrap candy -
xsite pro -
zygor guides -
37 days to clean credit -
advanced defrag -
adware alert -
adware bot -
affiliate prophet -
affiliate video brander -
anti spyware -
art of approaching -
atomic blogging -
auction classified cash -
automated cash formula -
bbq book -
bloggers pay check -
blogging in action -
body building revealed -
burnthefat -
burn the fat -
carb rotation diet -
cheat your way thin -
chopper tattoo -
cleanup the profits -
cold sore freedom in 3 days -
commission blueprint -
conversationalhypnosis -
conversational hypnosis -
cure for bruxism -
Post a Comment